- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:07:39 +0100
- To: "Paul Walsh, Segala" <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Cc: kidehen@openlinksw.com, public-sweo-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <45CC721B.3020501@w3.org>
Paul Walsh, Segala wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Ivan Herman > > Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >>Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: >> >> >>>I've promoted things like "what if you could take your bank statement >>>and add it to the calendar along with the dates you get your paycheck, >>>and see how it fits with when you can afford to fly off for a >>>vacation". If that could be condensed to something understandable... >>> >>>Cheers, >>> >>>Kjetil >>> >> >>Kjetil, >> >>How about: >>"Why can't I join my list of LinkedIn contacts with the list of feeds >>that I keep at Syndic8?" for instance? >> > > > I have to be religious here:-) W3C's vendor neutrality requires to > reduce the references to real company to the strict minimum, certainly > on a page like the SW Activity page! > > [PW] This is very good to know. David is going to propose 2 projects; > contentlabel.org to create new codes of conduct using POWDER (feel free to > hit me every time I say Content Labels on this list ;)) > > The second will be for Browser extensions/plug-ins to demonstrate how POWDER > (and other Semantic stuff) can benefit end users. This is where your comment > is useful. At present searchthresher.com is not Segala branded as we wanted > to get something up very quickly. However we're going to launch a new site > and pull the extension in with it. I won't waste time doing this if I think > there's a strong possibility of getting this onto the project list. > Likewise, I don't want to pull the blog down if it's not going to make it > onto the list. > > I'm more than happy to have the extension branded with the same brand as I > intend to create for POWDER/Content Labels. > There is a difference between projects done by member of an IG/WG on behalf of the IG/WG and what goes on the 'central' Web pages like the activity page. The latter would/could reflect a strong backing of W3C as an organization, and that is what I try to avoid. For those pages, I would be probably more catholic than the pope:-) Ivan > Advice/comments welcome :) > > Thanks > Paul > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 13:07:28 UTC