- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:27:42 -0500
- To: john.breslin@deri.org
- CC: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
John Breslin wrote: > > Hi all - > > I just want to give an introduction to new list members regarding > SIOC, the (Semantically-Interconnected Online Communities) project > [1], lead by DERI at NUI Galway. I know Uldis has given a brief > overview in his hello message... Basically, what SIOC is is an open > specification for describing communities using online discussion > forums / blogs / mailing lists / etc., leading to what some may term > distributed conversations and channels (see discussion clouds picture > at [2]). At the moment, online communities are islands that are not > well interlinked, and the SIOC ontology has been proposed to not only > link these communities but to leverage data in ways that were > previously unknown. > > We know that Web 2.0 applications such as blogging and wikis have > become very popular and at the same time have created an > interconnected information space (through the “blogosphere” and > inter-wiki links). Also, the Semantic Web is increasingly aiming at > applications areas, and can help address certain boundaries that Web > 2.0 applications are experiencing in terms of information > dissemination and automation (e.g. semantic blogging, semantic wikis, > etc.). So far, it is probably fair to say that the Semantic Web effort > has been mainly towards producing standards and recommendations that > will interlink applications, and Web 2.0 was about providing > collaborative user applications - these are not mutually exclusive as > many Web 2.0 applications can and will use Semantic Web technologies > to great benefit (see our recent tutorial on Semantic Web 2.0 at [3]). > > If the blogosphere is the interconnected world of weblogs, and the > boardscape is the world of message boards, the "SIOC-o-sphere" can be > thought of as the combination of these and other spheres of discussion > (Usenet, mailing lists, image gallery discussions, event chats, etc.). > Just as the blogosphere has become a proving ground for Web 2.0 > applications, we envisage the siocosphere and its interconnected > representation of all Web-based community discussions as being a > bridge from Web 2.0 to the Semantic Web. > > The initial version of our SIOC specification was released some time > ago. It can be used in conjunction with other RDF formats such as FOAF > and SKOS (see the picture of overlaps at [4]). In terms of producing > metadata, we've started with SIOC exporters for open-source discussion > systems such as WordPress, Drupal, dotClear, and more are on the way > (I started the phpBB one last week). You can also represent mailing > lists in SIOC using the SWAML system. > > While there are many (useful) classes and properties in SIOC, it can > essentially be boiled down to: Users create Posts that are contained > in Forums that are hosted on Sites, e.g. > > Site -> host_of -> Forum -> container_of -> Post -> has_creator -> User > > Posts have reply Posts, and Forums can be parents of other Forums. > > I know it's difficult to get a good feeling for what SIOC is from a > mail message, but we have some presentations [5] in PDF or video > format that may help explain things graphically, and I am looking > forward to your inputs and of course continued SIOC interest via SWEO. > > Thanks, > > John. > -- > [1] http://sioc-project.org/ > [2] http://sioc-project.org/node/139 > [3] http://sw.deri.org/~jbreslin/presentations/20060526a.pdf > [4] http://sioc-project.org/node/158 > [5] http://sioc-project.org/presentations > John, So in a nutshell we have a potential "Killer Demonstration" for the Blogosphere (which is the Web 2.0 epicenter) that simplifies comprehension of the fundamental Semantic Web value proposition: a Web of Data that's oriented towards "Meshing" and "Joining". A complimentary enhancement to the "Web of Services" (what Web 2.0 really is all about) that emits data that can only be mashed due to lack of context and meaning. A simple example: Wouldn't it be nice to unequivocally state to typical Web 2.0 thought leaders and the broader Web community [1][2][3] that by having Web 1.0/2.0 presence you also have Semantic Web presence? That the minimum requirement is simply the existence of a Feed (RSS 1.0, RSS 2.0, or Atom) that syndicates your content?. Links: 1. http://demo.openlinksw.com/tutorial/xml/xq_s_4/gnomedexers.vsp (Gnomedex 2005 attendees) 2. http://demo.openlinksw.com/tutorial/xml/xq_s_4/techcrunch.vsp (TechCrunch meetup) 3. http://demo.openlinksw.com/tutorial/xml/xq_s_4/web2005.vsp (2005 Web 2.0 Speakers) 4. http://demo.openlinksw.com/tutorial/xml/xq_s_4/blog100.vsp (Blogosphere 100) Note: Click on the SIOC gems for the RDF/XML serialization of the SIOC Instance Data. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 16:27:57 UTC