- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 21:22:21 +0100
- To: "Lee Feigenbaum" <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
On 06/12/06, Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com> wrote:
[adjudicated showcase as primary concern - I agree]
we can have our
> cake and eat it too...
Absolutely.
A possible approach would be for the Showcase and Comprehensive lists
to share the same RDF repository.
The Showcase material would feature information manually entered &
maintained by us (including references to any external SWEO docs,
tutorials etc).
[
doap:name "Some mature app" ;
a doap:Project ;
a sweo:ShowcaseProject .
]
The Comprehensive list could be initialised with what we've got
already (i.e. chuck the DOAP & doc lists into the store), maintainance
a combination of automated processes, e.g. if a project homepage is
404ing,
[
doap:name "Some old app" ;
a doap:Project ;
sweo:status [
a http:Response ;
http:responseCode "404" ;
dc:date "2006-12-06" .
]
]
...and entry by the project maintainers themselves - have a location
for developers to submit the URI of their DOAP (or whatever). Access
control on submissions would need consideration, but at this point in
time I don't think spam would be a major issue due to the effort
needed to produce the RDF.
Cheers,
Danny.
--
http://dannyayers.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 20:22:42 UTC