- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:37:29 -0500
- To: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
I claim victory on this action. See: http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering#preview Wiki edits are welcome, but for possible email discussion, here's the text I added: """ Information Gathering Output Lee: I think that there are two possible types of collateral that an Information Gathering task force could produce. The first is set of comprehensive resource lists. This would be a set of lists of all Semantic Web books, articles, tools, applications, tutorials, demonstrations that we know of. Parts of these lists could be created automatically (e.g. with DOAP or by scraping Amazon.com), parts could be created semiautomatically (e.g. by maintaining sweo tagged links in del.icio.us and pulling those into the output) and parts could be curated manually. What would this collateral look like visually? Wing has suggested using SIMILE's Exhibit to visualize these comprehensive list in a faceted search/browsing manner. Kingsley has (I think) suggested using ?OpenLink's ODS infrastructure to present this data. The second option for what collateral could be produced is what Karen called an adjudicated showcase. For this option, we would settle upon some manner of determining the most mature, most accessible, and, indeed, best resources in each category we examine. We would feature a select number of books, or tutorials, of tools, and of demonstrations. Personally, I prefer this second option. I think that limited, high-quality lists are of much greater value than comprehensive lists for educating and reaching out to people who are not already Semantic Web believers. A developer wishing to try out SW technologies for a new project will fare better with a list of the top 10 tools to implement SW solutions rather than a comprehensive list of hundreds of tools in various states of maturity. A LOB-manager wishing to familiarize herself with the SW world would likely prefer a select list of the top 3 SW-for-business books or presentations than a comprehensive list of scores aimed at various audiences and in various degrees of polish. Of course, such showcases could link to comprehensive lists, so perhaps we can have our cake and eat it too... """ Lee
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 19:37:54 UTC