- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:11:16 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:52:46PM +0100, Antoine Isaac wrote: > >1674,1676c1676,1678 > >< <code>skos:prefLabel</code>, in combination with private use language > >< (sub-)tags as defined by <cite>RFC4646</cite> [<cite><a > >--- > >><code>skos:prefLabel</code>, in combination with private-use language > >>tags (or subtags) as defined by <cite>RFC 4646</cite> [<cite><a > > In principle I'd be happy with this change, but > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4646.txt still uses "private use" subtags... Well, in that case, okay. > >Systematic spelling of "modeling" and "labeling" > > I supposed this applies as well to "labelled", I've changed them > Btw there are some "labelling" in the SKOS reference! Well spotted. Alistair and Sean take note... > >"Like" versus "such as" (really not a big deal, but "such as" is sometimes > >more precise) > > OK, except maybe > > >1133,1134c1134,1136 > >< re-assert the RDF statements for the <code>ex1:cats</code> concept, e.g., its > >< <code>skos:prefLabel</code>. Assuming <code>ex1:cats</code> has been > >--- > >>re-assert things such as the <code>skos:prefLabel</code> of the > >>the <code>ex1:cats</code> concept. > >>Assuming <code>ex1:cats</code> has been > > You would use "things" here, really? Wouldn't "Information" be more > accurate, if you don't like "statements"? The sentence in question is: Note that the information source defining the new concept scheme does not re-assert the RDF statements for the ex1:cats concept, e.g., its skos:prefLabel. I think it was the notion of "re-asserting" an RDF statement that had me briefly flummoxed. As in: is this about making NEW statements that happen to say the same thing or actually about somehow re-asserting THE SAME statements (and how does one do that - with some sort of import...)? I agree about "things" versus "information", and I think "replicate" might clarify things, so perhaps: ...does not replicate information about the <code>ex1:cats</code> concept, such as its preferred label. Tom -- Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 12:12:00 UTC