Re: [SKOS] Comments on SKOS Primer

Tom,

And here is some reaction to your more detailed comments.
Almost everything was really helpful making the document more elegant!

Thank you very much again for this precious help,

Antoine

> 
> ======================================================================
> Diff output, by type of change, from "significant" to "minor"
> ======================================================================
> 

These are all nice enhancements, I think!

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Editorial changes that should be checked more closely
> 

> 1674,1676c1676,1678
> < <code>skos:prefLabel</code>, in combination with private use language
> < (sub-)tags as defined by <cite>RFC4646</cite> [<cite><a
> ---
>> <code>skos:prefLabel</code>, in combination with private-use language
>> tags (or subtags) as defined by <cite>RFC 4646</cite> [<cite><a

In principle I'd be happy with this change, but http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4646.txt still uses "private use" subtags...


> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Systematic spelling of "modeling" and "labeling"

I supposed this applies as well to "labelled", I've changed them
Btw there are some "labelling" in the SKOS reference!


> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> KOSs (plural of KOS)
> 

OK!

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Note -- " as opposed to "Note on", which looks nicer, in my opinion...:-)
> 

+1

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Like" versus "such as" (really not a big deal, but "such as" is sometimes more precise)
> 


OK, except maybe

> 1133,1134c1134,1136
> < re-assert the RDF statements for the <code>ex1:cats</code> concept, e.g., its
> < <code>skos:prefLabel</code>. Assuming <code>ex1:cats</code> has been
> ---
>> re-assert things such as the <code>skos:prefLabel</code> of the
>> the <code>ex1:cats</code> concept.
>> Assuming <code>ex1:cats</code> has been

You would use "things" here, really? Wouldn't "Information" be more accurate, if you don't like "statements"?

> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Minor editorial changes
> 

All are OK.

> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "This version" URIs (instead of "latest version" URIs)
> 
OK!

Received on Tuesday, 6 January 2009 14:53:30 UTC