- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:05:40 +0200
- To: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Sounds very sensible! Antoine > Here is a draft response to Michael on ISSUE-141, comments welcome. > > --- begin draft message --- > > Dear Michael, > > Thank you for your detailed and helpful comments. In response to your > comment below: > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:47:27AM +0000, SWD Issue Tracker wrote: > >> ISSUE-141: Last Call Comment: almost-duplicate examples >> >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/141 >> >> Raised by: Alistair Miles >> On product: SKOS >> >> Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]: >> >> """ >> The whole document contains several such cases, where two or even more very >> similar examples are given. If you haven't done so already, you might consider >> whether this is good practice, and perhaps decide to drop all those >> "almost-duplicates". >> """ >> > > We realise that, for those with experience of logics and entailment, > such example may appear trivial and redundant. However, many readers > of the SKOS Reference will not have extensive experience of logical > entailment, and hence we have included these almost-duplicate examples > to provide a clear illustration of the simple entailments that follow > from the SKOS data model for these readers. > > We propose to retain these examples, can you live with this? > > Kind regards, > > Alistair > Sean > > >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 20:06:48 UTC