- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:18:53 +0200
- To: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Sounds good! Antoine > Here is a draft response to Erik on issue 150, comments welcome. > > --- begin draft message --- > > Dear Erik, > > Thank you for your helpful comments. In response to your comment > below: > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:18:49PM +0000, SWD Issue Tracker wrote: > >> ISSUE-150: Last Call Comment: Subsumption hierarchies >> >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/150 >> >> Raised by: Alistair Miles >> On product: SKOS >> >> Raised by Erik Hennum in [1]: >> >> """ >> We've had a need to distinguish subsumptive relations (for which we >> currently use the SKOS broaderGeneric / narrowerGeneric extension) from >> broader relations where the broader concept is not fully subsumptive. >> >> For instance, there is consensus in our target audience that the concept of >> Linux subsumes the concept of RedHat Linux. By contrast, the High >> Availability concept subsumes the overall purpose but not the operational >> tasks associated with the Disaster Recovery concept. (In passing, >> subsumption relations seem much more common between proper-noun concepts >> than between general concepts.) >> >> The distinction is important because subsumption is much more reliable for >> qualifying content during search applications (and can be treated as >> strongly transitive). Has the committee considered carrying forward this >> experimental distinction from the previous version of SKOS as an optional >> subproperty of broader / narrower? >> """ >> > > Yes, the working group has considered carrying forward the > experimental extensions to skos:broader and skos:narrower. This was > discussed as ISSUE-56. In May the WG resolved to postpone this issue > [2], because we do not yet have sufficient information on how to embed > the specialisations in the current SKOS model. The view was that > further work, in particular on patterns and conventions for using SKOS > and OWL in combination, was required before a standard set of > extensions could be proposed. > > We encourage the development and publication of third-party extensions > to the SKOS data model within the community of practice. The SKOS > Reference (section 8.6.3) and the SKOS Primer (section 4.7) provide > information and examples of how to do this. > > Can you live with the postponement of this issue? > > Kind regards, > > Alistair > Sean > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0103.html > [ISSUE-56] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/56 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item02 > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 19:19:21 UTC