- From: Sini, Margherita (KCEW) <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:05:56 +0100
- To: "Reul, Q. H." <q.reul@abdn.ac.uk>, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Yes, much more clear as you suggested. Regards Margherita -----Original Message----- From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Reul, Q. H. Sent: 08 January 2008 16:14 To: public-swd-wg@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-67: StatingFormalDefinitions Hi all, I read the SKOS reference [1] and I wouldn't say that I found any formal definition confusing. However, I found that many terms used to represent the SKOS properties or concepts could be confusing such as skos:broader (as discussed in [2]) and skos:labelRelated [3]. I would suggest that we use a formal definition such as skos:Concept rdf:type owl:Class, which should remove any confusion about the definition. Regards, Quentin [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20071223 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0039.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0008.html ****************************************** * Quentin H. Reul * * PhD Research Student * * Department of Computing Science * * University of Aberdeen, King's College * * Room 238 in the Meston Building * * ABERDEEN AB24 3UE * * Phone: +44 (0)1224 27 4485 * * http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul * ******************************************
Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 12:06:11 UTC