W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > January 2008

RE: ISSUE-67: StatingFormalDefinitions

From: Sini, Margherita (KCEW) <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:05:56 +0100
To: "Reul, Q. H." <q.reul@abdn.ac.uk>, public-swd-wg@w3.org
Message-id: <BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690269F968@hqgiex01.fao.org>

Yes, much more clear as you suggested.

Regards
Margherita

-----Original Message-----
From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Reul, Q. H.
Sent: 08 January 2008 16:14
To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-67: StatingFormalDefinitions



Hi all,

I read the SKOS reference [1] and I wouldn't say that I found any formal
definition confusing. However, I found that many terms used to represent the
SKOS properties or concepts could be confusing such as skos:broader (as
discussed in [2]) and skos:labelRelated [3].

I would suggest that we use a formal definition such as skos:Concept rdf:type
owl:Class, which should remove any confusion about the definition.

Regards,

Quentin

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20071223
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0039.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0008.html

******************************************
* Quentin H. Reul                        *
* PhD Research Student                   *
* Department of Computing Science        *
* University of Aberdeen, King's College *
* Room 238 in the Meston Building        *
* ABERDEEN AB24 3UE                      *
* Phone: +44 (0)1224 27 4485             *
* http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~qreul       *
******************************************
Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 12:06:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:47 UTC