RE: [ALL] Amsterdam agenda item "Cool URIs"


Ok. I am available on Monday 8 Oct till about 17:00 CET on
IRC and phone. If you wish so, I'll certainly lead the
discussion, though I'm not sure if my review is still welcome
when looking at 'Topic 2' in [1] ;)

As my first action on this task I'd like to propose to
exclude all editorial-only issues. I understand that Leo and
his colleagues are collecting a bunch of comments, hence it 
makes no sense to actually go into detail about correct citation, etc.

Leo asked in [2] for statements like

>>"the SWD reviewed the document and we think these points need to be
>> wrong information (errors, wrong interpretation of W3C decisions):
>> A, B, C
>> these points may be done to make the document more readable:
>> D, E, F"

and this is exactly what I plan to deliver to him as an output
of our discussion, along with the content (details) of the Wiki page.


PS: Tuesday is at risk (I'm in a project meeting, already)
PPS: Regrets for today's telecon ...


 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH

>-----Original Message-----
>[] On Behalf Of Thomas Baker
>Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 2:25 PM
>To: SWD Working Group
>Subject: [ALL] Amsterdam agenda item "Cool URIs"
>Dear all,
>I propose that we put the review of "Cool URIs" onto the
>agenda.  Michael, you have volunteered to edit the wiki page --
>might you also be available sometime on Monday (afternoon),
>preferably, or on Tuesday (all day but preferably afternoon)
>to lead the discussion by phone?
>Our goal should be to discuss and finalize the review as an
>expression of group opinion.  I propose that the full draft
>note and review be required reading.
>> Review of Cool URIs (Michael)
>Tom Baker - -

Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 12:56:09 UTC