- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:14:35 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-64: TextualDescriptionsForConcepts http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/64 Raised by: Alistair Miles On product: SKOS SKOS currently has 7 "documentation"/"note" properties: skos:note, skos:scopeNote, skos:defition, skos:historyNote, skos:editorialNote, skos:changeNote, skos:example. In the SKOS Core Guide <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102>, 3 different design patterns are allowed for these properties -- "documentation as an RDF literal", "documentation as a related resource description", and "documentation as a document reference". Do we continue to allow these different design patterns? If we do, we have to accept a complex range for these properties. Is that OK? How should we formally specify that?
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2007 13:14:44 UTC