- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:16:38 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-31: BasicLexicalLabelSemantics http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31 Raised by: Alistair Miles On product: SKOS Can a resource have two "preferred lexical labels"? Can a lexical label be both "preferred" and "alternative" for the same resource? If a lexical label is "hidden", can it also be "preferred" or "alternative" for the same resource? See also <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/BasicLexicalLabelSemantics> Imagine the SKOS vocabulary consisted only of skos:prefLabel, skos:altLabel and skos:hiddenLabel. I.e. forget everything else for the moment. Now, consider the following RDF graph: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "bar"@en. The resource ex:foo has two different preferred lexical labels in the same language. Is this graph inconsistent? What about the following: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:altLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both a preferred and an alternative lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent? Consider another graph: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:prefLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:hiddenLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both a preferred and a hidden lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent? Finally, consider: @prefix ex: <http://www.example.com/examples#>. @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>. ex:foo skos:altLabel "foo"@en. ex:foo skos:hiddenLabel "foo"@en. The label "foo"@en is given as both an alternative and a hidden lexical label for the resource ex:foo. Is this graph inconsistent?
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 13:16:42 UTC