Re: [ALL] Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC

Me too, of course Merry Christmas to all!

Cheers,

Simone

On Dec 18, 2007 4:19 PM, Vit Novacek <vit.novacek@deri.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> regrets for this (and the following, till January 8th)  meeting - I'm on
> holidays, so I won't be generally available, at least on phone, even though I
> might follow you on IRC on some occasions.
>
> Cheers,
> Vit
>
>
> Thomas Baker wrote:
> > Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
> > W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
> >     http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
> >     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/
> >     Tuesday, 1600 UTC / 0800 Seattle / 1100 Boston / 1600 London / 1700 Amsterdam
> >     Phone
> >         Boston: +1-617-761-6200
> >         Nice: +33-4-8906-3499
> >         Bristol: +44-117-370-6152
> >     Conference code 79394# ('SWDWG')
> >     IRC irc://irc.w3.org:6665/swd Web-based IRC (member-only)
> >
> > Chair: Tom
> > Scribe: Michael (Jon on deck)
> > Regrets:
> >
> > Attendance of SWD WG telecons is restricted to registered WG
> > participants and persons invited by the chairs.
> >
> > ======================================================================
> >
> > 1. ADMIN (10 min)
> > ---------------------------------------
> >
> > PROPOSED to accept minutes of the Dec 04 telecon:
> >
> >      http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html
> >
> > Next telecon: 4 December 1600 UTC
> >
> > Upcoming telecons and scribes -
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ScribeDuty
> >
> > ======================================================================
> > 2. SKOS - see
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#SKOS
> >
> > -- SKOS Reference (Alistair, Sean)
> >
> > Goal: produce new draft before the holidays and use the
> > holiday period for review.
> >
> > ACTION: Quentin to review Editor's draft of SKOS Reference [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action02]
> >
> > ACTION: Vit to review Editor's draft of SKOS Reference [recorded in ]http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action03]
> >
> > -- SKOS Primer (Antoine, Ed)
> >    http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Primer
> >
> > ACTION: Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-swd-minutes.html#action05]
> >
> > -- ISSUE-39 Conceptual mapping links
> >    http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/39
> >
> > ACTION: Antoine to send a msg proposing a resolution for next week telecon on ISSUE-39 considering Alistair's 3 subtopics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html#action07]
> >
> >     ON THIS CALL, we decide whether to accept as a solution to ISSUE-39
> >     http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptualMapping/ProposalTwo?action=recall&rev=5
> >     With respect to sub-topics raised by Alistair:
> >
> >     (ISSUE-39A) Should "grouping" constructs for mapping be included, and if
> >     so, what are their semantics?
> >
> >         This sub-issue is postponed until until a solution has been found to
> >         ISSUE-40 ConceptCoordination [8] and ISSUE-45
> >         NaryLinksBetweenDescriptorsAndNonDescriptors [9], which are about very
> >         similar problems.
> >
> >     (ISSUE-39B) Is it necessary to have parallel vocabulary (skos:broader //
> >     skos:broadMatch etc.)? If not, how do you differentiate between
> >     intra-scheme vs. inter-scheme semantic links?
> >
> >         This sub-issue is dealt with: the SKOS mapping relations are
> >         introduced as parallel to the existing SKOS semantic relations
> >         (skos:broader, etc)
> >
> >     (ISSUE-39C) What's the difference between "related" and "overlapping"? Is
> >     there enough precedent to justify a new property for "overlapping"?
> >
> >         This sub-issue is dealt with: only skos:relatedMatch is kept in the
> >         proposal, and a discussion item gives motivation for it.
> >
> > -- SKOS Extension Module
> >    http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/SKOS-XL
> >
> > ACTION: Alistair to propose an approach to clarify which aspects of the extension module should be in scope for the candidate recommendation package. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html#action06]
> >
> > -- ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment
> >    http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36
> >
> > ACTION: Antoine to send a mail to the list so as to have a discussion on ISSUE-36 and isDefinedBy for next week's telecon [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html#action09]
> >
> >     ON THIS CALL: Antoine proposes that the WG adopt the following
> >     resolution for Issue-36 [2]:
> >
> >     RESOLUTION: skos:inScheme is not deprecated, skos:inScheme is not a
> >     subproperty of rdfs:isDefinedBy. In accordance [3] can be kept, but
> >     adding inScheme in the proposed vocabulary as well as domain and range
> >     statements for this property. It should also include the following
> >     sentence: "The SKOS Primer also defines best practices for using
> >     skos:inScheme to explicitly state the relationship between a SKOS
> >     conceptual resource and the concept scheme(s) to which it belongs."
> >
> >     The general idea is "we let the opportunity of using rdfs:isDefinedBy
> >     for some purposes open, but skos:inScheme is clearly what is needed for
> >     concept scheme membership and we keep it in the SKOS language".
> >
> >     [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0058.html
> >     [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptSchemes/MinimalProposal?action=recall&rev=1
> >
> > ACTION: Alistair and Guus to prepare material for next week on Concept Schemes vs OWL Ontologies [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-swd-minutes.html#action04]
> >
> > ACTION: Ralph to reconstruct proposal for semantics of isDefinedBy [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
> >
> >     Antoine proposes that this be reformulated to read:
> >     "Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of
> >     rdfs:isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in [1]."
> >
> >     [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html
> >
> > ACTION: Guus to write up the issue [of Label Resource] and add to the issue list. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action01]
> >
> > ======================================================================
> > 3. RDFa - see RDFa Overview document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/
> >
> > -- RDFa Task Force telecons
> >    Teleconferences on Thursdays, 1600 UTC - open to "everyone interested in RDFa"
> >    irc://irc.w3.org:6665/rdfa, conference code 7332# ('RDFa').
> >    Minutes of last telecon:
> >    http://www.w3.org/2007/12/06-rdfa-minutes.html
> >
> > Update: Diego and Ed will review updated syntax document
> > (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/) before holidays.  We will
> > take a decision on 8 January telecon (with XHTML2 WG) on Last Call
> > comment period of 4 to 6 weeks.
> >
> > ACTION: Ben and Michael to address comments by Tom [regarding maintenance of wiki document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa] recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action05]
> >
> > ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action03]
> >
> > ACTION: Ben to update RDFa schedule in wiki http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_schedule [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action04]
> >
> > ======================================================================
> > 4. RECIPES - see
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#Recipes
> >
> > We are currently looking at Recipes editors' draft of 3 December: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/draft-20071203
> >
> > ACTION: Ralph and Ed to review recipes document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html#action18]
> >
> >     ON THIS CALL, can we approve the publication of the Editor's
> >     Draft of 3 December as a (revised) Working Draft replacing [2]?
> >     Then confirm intentions to finish the work as a Note, set schedule.
> >     update wiki [3].
> >
> >     [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/draft-20071203
> >     [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/
> >     [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#Recipes.
> >
> > ACTION: Dan to ask apache about conditional redirects [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action07]
> >
> > ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
> >
> > ACTION: Ralph to come up with a URI for wiki page [for Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action04]
> > -- see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0057.html
> >
> > ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action03]
> >
> > ======================================================================
> > 5. VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT - see
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#VocabularyMgt
> >
> > ACTION: Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially a standard structure for sections [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action07]
> >
> >
>
>
> - --
> Vit Novacek
>
> SmILE group
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
> National University of Ireland, Galway
> Lower Dangan
> Galway, Ireland
> Tel: +353 91 495738
> Fax: +353 91 495541
> Web: http://www.deri.ie/about/team/member/vit_novacek/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFHZ+Tzc7uyClWR0g8RAgIoAJ4ytagnG+3hVd6w1mNQeQoG8Q6ZGQCfdgDU
> zypZ2GZqvSK4SvQBpEp1PPE=
> =PEjV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>



-- 
Simone Onofri
http://www.siatec.net/

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 15:46:15 UTC