- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:59:58 +0100
- To: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Agenda - Dec 18 2007 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC
W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/
Tuesday, 1600 UTC / 0800 Seattle / 1100 Boston / 1600 London / 1700 Amsterdam
Phone
Boston: +1-617-761-6200
Nice: +33-4-8906-3499
Bristol: +44-117-370-6152
Conference code 79394# ('SWDWG')
IRC irc://irc.w3.org:6665/swd Web-based IRC (member-only)
Chair: Tom
Scribe: Michael (Jon on deck)
Regrets:
Attendance of SWD WG telecons is restricted to registered WG
participants and persons invited by the chairs.
======================================================================
1. ADMIN (10 min)
---------------------------------------
PROPOSED to accept minutes of the Dec 04 telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html
Next telecon: 4 December 1600 UTC
Upcoming telecons and scribes -
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ScribeDuty
======================================================================
2. SKOS - see
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#SKOS
-- SKOS Reference (Alistair, Sean)
Goal: produce new draft before the holidays and use the
holiday period for review.
ACTION: Quentin to review Editor's draft of SKOS Reference [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action02]
ACTION: Vit to review Editor's draft of SKOS Reference [recorded in ]http://www.w3.org/2007/11/20-swd-minutes.html#action03]
-- SKOS Primer (Antoine, Ed)
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Primer
ACTION: Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/06-swd-minutes.html#action05]
-- ISSUE-39 Conceptual mapping links
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/39
ACTION: Antoine to send a msg proposing a resolution for next week telecon on ISSUE-39 considering Alistair's 3 subtopics [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html#action07]
ON THIS CALL, we decide whether to accept as a solution to ISSUE-39
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptualMapping/ProposalTwo?action=recall&rev=5
With respect to sub-topics raised by Alistair:
(ISSUE-39A) Should "grouping" constructs for mapping be included, and if
so, what are their semantics?
This sub-issue is postponed until until a solution has been found to
ISSUE-40 ConceptCoordination [8] and ISSUE-45
NaryLinksBetweenDescriptorsAndNonDescriptors [9], which are about very
similar problems.
(ISSUE-39B) Is it necessary to have parallel vocabulary (skos:broader //
skos:broadMatch etc.)? If not, how do you differentiate between
intra-scheme vs. inter-scheme semantic links?
This sub-issue is dealt with: the SKOS mapping relations are
introduced as parallel to the existing SKOS semantic relations
(skos:broader, etc)
(ISSUE-39C) What's the difference between "related" and "overlapping"? Is
there enough precedent to justify a new property for "overlapping"?
This sub-issue is dealt with: only skos:relatedMatch is kept in the
proposal, and a discussion item gives motivation for it.
-- SKOS Extension Module
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/SKOS-XL
ACTION: Alistair to propose an approach to clarify which aspects of the extension module should be in scope for the candidate recommendation package. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html#action06]
-- ISSUE-36 ConceptSchemeContainment
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36
ACTION: Antoine to send a mail to the list so as to have a discussion on ISSUE-36 and isDefinedBy for next week's telecon [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html#action09]
ON THIS CALL: Antoine proposes that the WG adopt the following
resolution for Issue-36 [2]:
RESOLUTION: skos:inScheme is not deprecated, skos:inScheme is not a
subproperty of rdfs:isDefinedBy. In accordance [3] can be kept, but
adding inScheme in the proposed vocabulary as well as domain and range
statements for this property. It should also include the following
sentence: "The SKOS Primer also defines best practices for using
skos:inScheme to explicitly state the relationship between a SKOS
conceptual resource and the concept scheme(s) to which it belongs."
The general idea is "we let the opportunity of using rdfs:isDefinedBy
for some purposes open, but skos:inScheme is clearly what is needed for
concept scheme membership and we keep it in the SKOS language".
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0058.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/ConceptSchemes/MinimalProposal?action=recall&rev=1
ACTION: Alistair and Guus to prepare material for next week on Concept Schemes vs OWL Ontologies [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-swd-minutes.html#action04]
ACTION: Ralph to reconstruct proposal for semantics of isDefinedBy [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
Antoine proposes that this be reformulated to read:
"Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of
rdfs:isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in [1]."
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html
ACTION: Guus to write up the issue [of Label Resource] and add to the issue list. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action01]
======================================================================
3. RDFa - see RDFa Overview document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/
-- RDFa Task Force telecons
Teleconferences on Thursdays, 1600 UTC - open to "everyone interested in RDFa"
irc://irc.w3.org:6665/rdfa, conference code 7332# ('RDFa').
Minutes of last telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2007/12/06-rdfa-minutes.html
Update: Diego and Ed will review updated syntax document
(http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/) before holidays. We will
take a decision on 8 January telecon (with XHTML2 WG) on Last Call
comment period of 4 to 6 weeks.
ACTION: Ben and Michael to address comments by Tom [regarding maintenance of wiki document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa] recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action05]
ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action03]
ACTION: Ben to update RDFa schedule in wiki http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa#RDFa_schedule [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action04]
======================================================================
4. RECIPES - see
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#Recipes
We are currently looking at Recipes editors' draft of 3 December: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/draft-20071203
ACTION: Ralph and Ed to review recipes document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/11-swd-minutes.html#action18]
ON THIS CALL, can we approve the publication of the Editor's
Draft of 3 December as a (revised) Working Draft replacing [2]?
Then confirm intentions to finish the work as a Note, set schedule.
update wiki [3].
[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/draft-20071203
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#Recipes.
ACTION: Dan to ask apache about conditional redirects [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action07]
ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
ACTION: Ralph to come up with a URI for wiki page [for Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action04]
-- see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0057.html
ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#action03]
======================================================================
5. VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT - see
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#VocabularyMgt
ACTION: Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially a standard structure for sections [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action07]
--
Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 10:00:17 UTC