- From: Feng Pan <pan@ISI.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:51:49 -0700
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>, Jerry Hobbs <hobbs@ISI.EDU>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi Ralph, > You didn't comment about the Time Zone draft [2], and Feng > did not indicate when I asked in [3] whether he expected to > make any updates to that document. As for the Time Zone draft, we have already addressed all the previous comments in the current version [2], and have been waiting for Guus' comments. I didn't answer your question in [3] because you already asked in [3] "Guus, I guess we're in need of your followup review comments on this draft", and that's also what we have been waiting for in order to further update the document. > Perhaps (as someone else suggested) the Time Zone document > could be merged with the Time Ontology document as an appendix? > What do you think, Feng? I think I will need to ask Jerry about it after he's back, but Chris summerized it very well in [4] why we decided to split those into two: "Feng decided to split the notes into two, one describing the time ontology and another describing just time zones, since they are actually broken into two ontologies anyway. I agree with Feng & Jerry that this makes sense, as the time zone ontology is usable by itself, without having to understand the time ontology." Thanks! Feng > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Time-Zone-20060418 > [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jun/0040.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0091.html -- Feng Pan, Ph.D. Candidate USC Information Sciences Institute (ISI) Email: pan@isi.edu Web: http://www.isi.edu/~pan/
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 14:53:09 UTC