Re: [ALL] RDF/A Primer Version


Yes, I want to make it very clear that I did not attempt to factor  
any comments into this version *yet*, just so I could keep the level  
of confusion to a minimum. Of course, we intend to promptly address  
every comment in time for WD #2.


On Jan 24, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Frank Manola wrote:

> All the points I raised in my earlier email 
> Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0114.html
> still apply to this new version.  A couple of additional points:
> 1.  The new Section 2 provides a possible place to introduce what a  
> "property" is in a simple way.  In Section 2.2,  the sentence that  
> starts "Jo then looks through the FoaF vocabulary..." could be  
> changed to:
> "Jo then looks through the FoaF vocabulary, and sees that the  
> pieces of information that she has in her page--name, phone number  
> and email address--are all the names of properties within FoaF."
> A more extensive introduction to the "property" notion might be  
> better, but this suggestion at least involves little added text.
> 2.  At the very beginning of Section 2.2, the second sentence says  
> "All Jo needs to do is to add some *tags* [my emphasis] to her home  
> page...".   The third sentence goes on to say "The *tags* that  
> Terri's address book understands come from a special list-often  
> called a vocabulary...".  In neither case is "tag" the right word  
> (particularly since this is XHTML).  Syntactically, what you're  
> adding are attributes (and their values), although you may want to  
> use some informal alternative, since the attributes themselves  
> don't come from something like FoaF (although their values do), but  
> rather from RDF/A.
> --Frank
> Ben Adida wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I made a mistake in the version of the RDF/A Primer that I  
>> presented  at the telecon yesterday. I have just finished  
>> uploading the right  version, which you can find here:

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 21:34:01 UTC