RE: [VM] name for the cookbook

In his revision Ralph suggested a different name for what we have affectionately referred to so far as 'the cookbook' ... he suggests:

'Best Practices for Serving RDFS and OWL Vocabularies'

What about:

'Best Practice Recipes for Serving RDFS and OWL Vocabularies'

... ? Keeps the flavour in the title :)

Al.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Miles, AJ 
> (Alistair)
> Sent: 11 January 2006 11:44
> To: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston); public-swbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [VM] 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> > I think the diagrams are helpful!  They are not quite what I 
> > intended in
> > my E2[1] though, so my E2 comment may still be relevant.  My 
> > intent was
> > to suggest saying something (very brief) at the *beginning* of the
> > recipe, as a way to help the reader select the appropriate 
> > recipe.  For
> > example, in recipe 4 you might say something like:
> > [[
> > 	http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/example4/classA
> > is 303-redirected to
> > 	
> > http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/example4-content
> > /2005-10-3
> > 1.html#classA
> > or to 
> > 	
> > http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/example4-content
> > /2005-10-3
> > 1.rdf
> > depending on the content type requested.
> > ]]
> 
> Ok, I'll have a think about that.
> 
> > 
> > I do have one minor suggestion regarding client/server diagramming
> > conventions.  In client-server diagrams, I personally think 
> > it is better
> > to standardize on having the client on the left and server on 
> > the right.
> > The reason for this is that most interactions are intiated by the
> > client.  Thus, having the client on the left yields more of a
> > left-to-right flow than if the server is always on the 
> left.  (If you
> > number the actions you will see what I mean.)  Obviously, 
> > this is a very
> > minor issue, and to a large extent it may simply reflect a matter of
> > personal taste, but I offer this rationale in case it 
> resonates.  Feel
> > free to ignore it.
> 
> I'll put the clients on the left, best to be consistent with 
> convention I agree.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Al.
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 16 January 2006 19:30:17 UTC