- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:49:49 +0000
- To: Phil Tetlow <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Phil Tetlow wrote: > > > > Jeremy, > > Many thanks for your input. I guess we should wait for your complete review > of the updated version before preceeding with your comments? Can we assume > a couple of weeks for further review? > I was not planning a further complete review. My understanding was that we were looking for closure on the comments I had already made, rather than a new review of the final doc. Hence, I was ready to OK the doc, with the two minor changes I indicated. I was surprised by the amount of change since the version I reviewed, but without doing a side-by-side comparison I don't think I can tell if the changes are significant, and I am happy to defer to your judgment. [My sense of change may well be because in addressing my comments, the parts of the doc on which I commented were changed] Do you think a further review is needed? (The version I reviewed was from just before the F2F; I can't see a snapshot of it, but I assume it is in CVS somewhere. The figure number that I referred to in my comments with RDFIndividual seems to be different in all of the versions with snapshots) Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 15:03:42 UTC