Re: grounding wordnet in the web

On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 17:30 +0100, Mark van Assem wrote:
> Hi again,
> > Hmm... it seems fairly reasonable; but I don't recommend computing
> > the CBD on-demand.  I expect "baking" will be more manageable
> > than "frying".
> Ok, thanks for the suggestions. We don't know yet if we'll have a big 
> or small iron, but the document can stay agnostic to that issue (or at 
> least for the moment). Changes can be made later if we don't want to 
> return CBD's after all (whether or not they are baked or not), right?

Yes; that sort of behind-the-scenes info is largely orthogonal to [1].

>  I will try to rephrase the section so that 
> it's made clear that both usages are possible.


> [1]

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 16:38:08 UTC