RE: Confusion on httpRange-14 decision

At 01:28 PM 2/17/2006 -0500, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote:
>Ralph, Thanks for the improvements.  I've incorporated them below.  

You're welcome.  One more smallish one strikes me as I re-read this.

>If Dan is also using to identify a
>foaf:Person (for example by also serving RDF from
> , via 200 OK with Content-Type

(Note that Dan does not actually do this at present.  An HTTP GET
with "Accept: application/rdf+xml" on that URI currently returns
200 OK with Content-Type: text/html.  The XHTML document
that is returned offers transformation URIs to produce RDF.
But the scenario described is one that people are likely to
expect to be able to do.)


Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 16:13:53 UTC