- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:05:24 -0500
- To: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
I think what they most need is evidence that somebody will actually *use* the mapping that they are producing. David Booth > -----Original Message----- > From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > ewallace@cme.nist.gov > Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:31 PM > To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: Race condition for WSDL RDF mapping? > > > > > With respect to the WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping: > > Last month an email [1] was sent out to the SWS list calling > for reviews of the RDF mapping for WSDL. In this email, it > was mentioned that so few comments on this have been received > that they are considering dropping this from the WSDL 2 spec. > This is interesting given comments in our group that the > reviewers were looking (waiting) for a more complete mapping > before sending substantial comments. It would be a shame for > this mapping to go away because of a publication process > deadlock. Perhaps one of the reviewers within SWBPD could > send these people [2] an email explaining that its lack of > completeness has resulted in lack of feedbank.? > > -Evan > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sws-ig/2006Jan/0031.html > [2] public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > > >
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 22:05:33 UTC