- From: John McClure <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:52:33 -0700
- To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <MGEEIEEKKOMOLNHJAHMKMEBPDPAA.jmcclure@hypergrove.com>
Hello, Legal XHTML is preparing an ontology for legal documents which, of course, includes calendaring and timezone information . This ontology implements an n-ary type of design pattern such as your WG has proposed, believing that that pattern is a good solution for the relative unconventionality of predicates such as <hasName>, <hasDate>, and others of that ilk. Rather, Legal XHTML defines predicate verbs such as <has>, <willHave>, and others, leading we think towards a more intuitive, more useful, and more historically consistent form of coding, to wit (from Calendar2005.rdf, located in the zip file): <GregorianYear rdf:ID='&legalxhtml;Y2005'> <has rdf:parseType='Collection'> <Quarter1 rdf:about='&legalxhtml;Q20051'/> <Quarter2 rdf:about='&legalxhtml;Q20052'/> <Quarter3 rdf:about='&legalxhtml;Q20053'/> <Quarter4 rdf:about='&legalxhtml;Q20054'/> </has> </GregorianYear> My hope is that this information is helpful towards drafting a best statement. I'd be happy to answer any questions about this material here or offline. Thanks, John McClure
Attachments
- application/x-zip-compressed attachment: ISO.zip
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2005 16:51:32 UTC