- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:27:25 +0100
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
After having expressed a personal lack of enthusiasm for the Wordnet Task Force at Monday's telecon, I have discussed this situation with colleagues. The task force has broadly the following jobs to do in phase 1: 1. define a mapping relating Wordnet and Owl and possibly SKOS 2. build consensus for that mapping amongst the several groups who have built their own 3. build support with the wordnet authors to adopt, distribute and maintain the mapping 4. possibly develop and deploy a service making Wordnet in RDF available on the web We believe that the Wordnet in RDF/Owl is important and would like to ensure that it is completed successfully, but we are aware that time for the WG is running out. We suggest that we should take a realistic view of what can be accomplished within the lifetime of the WG. Then two questions arise: - is that a useful standalone contribution - how do we get the work completed after SWBP shuts down A further point that came up in our discussion is some recent work at the Univ. of Chile, inspired by some of the early drafts of the Wordnet TF: http://www.dcc.uchile.cl/~agraves/wordnet/ This is an additional group that figures under point 2 above. Jeremy [[Msg copied by bcc to agraves at dcc.uchile.cl to avoid adding to Alvaro's spam]]
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2005 16:30:01 UTC