- From: Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 18:10:12 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> writes:
> <rdf:RDF>
> <rdf:Description>
> <owl:sameAs rdf:parseType="Literal">
> XML Literal Here
> </owl:sameAs>
> <eg:p1 rdf:resource="v1"/>
> <eg:p2 rdf:resource="v2"/>
> <eg:p3>etc</eg:p3>
> </rdf:Description>
> </rdf:RDF>
What about RDF'ising "sub-literals"? e.g.
<foo eg:p1="v1">
<bar eg:p2="v2">
baz
</bar>
</foo>
Max.
Received on Monday, 3 October 2005 17:09:15 UTC