- From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:44:06 +0100
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
On 29 Nov 2005, at 08:17, McBride, Brian wrote: > > David has highlighted a concern with SPARQL and we are asking all WG > members if they can suggest a use case illustrating the issue. > > The issue concerns naming b-nodes. Consider a query Q which cannot be > directly expressed in SPARQL, but must be split into two stages. The > first stage Q' returns results which are processed by the querying > application, possibly including human review, and the nodes > selected are > the subject of further queries. If the nodes in question are b-nodes > there can be a problem because SPARQL does not provide a mechanism for > naming the b-nodes in question. It may be that the b-nodes can be > identified by some of their property values. The issue arises where > this is not the case. The issue of naming bnodes across queries is under investigation in the DAWG. --e. Enrico Franconi - franconi@inf.unibz.it Free University of Bozen-Bolzano - http://www.inf.unibz.it/~franconi/ Faculty of Computer Science - Phone: (+39) 0471-016-120 I-39100 Bozen-Bolzano BZ, Italy - Fax: (+39) 0471-016-129
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2005 08:44:35 UTC