- From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:00:06 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: Alistair Miles <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Guus, The document in question -- the one for which reviewers will be needed -- is not [1], but [2]. I am preparing a longer post to put this into perspective. Tom [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/principles/20050705 [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/http-examples/2005-11-18/ On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:56:37PM +0100, Guus Schreiber wrote: > From the scribe log of VM TF: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0046.html > > >Guus: Two things before lunch: (i) anyone want to review the short > >doc? > > > >David and Andreas agree to review it. > > As far as I can recall the action above (which I missed in the draft ftf > minutes) was to review the following document: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/principles/20050705 > > Is this the version to review or should the reviewers wait for an update? -- Dr. Thomas Baker baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de SUB - Goettingen State +49-551-39-3883 and University Library +49-30-8109-9027 Papendiek 14, 37073 Göttingen
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 09:59:46 UTC