[WN] comments on draft

• From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:48:25 +0000
• To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <437A0349.50607@hpl.hp.com>

Reviewed document:
http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark/wn/wn-conversion.html


1. the abstract is not an abstract

2. abstract/sotd or intro needs to set expectations about target
audience and contribution of this document, and its non-objectives

i.e.
[[
The TF should produce guidelines for transforming existing wordnets into
an RDF/OWL representation. Guidelines should describe strategies for
converting wordnets-like structures into an RDF representation, as well
as strategies for re-describing in RDF/OWL the content originally
conveyed in the wordnets.
]]

3. URI issue could/should be expanded, highlighted somewhat.
Covering:
  - do the terms like synset etc need a different URI from the terms in
the wordnet itself (e.g. #bank-1)
- different URIs for different versions?
- hash (one huge file) versus slash (303 response? WebArch issue)

Jeremy

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 15:49:21 UTC