I was reminded of my action at Monday's telecon. I had forgotten that I had in fact done something substantive i.e. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2005AprJun/0037.html with intro: [[ I was asked by the Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment WG to review your document. Unfortunately I was tardy in my review, and the WG has not had time to consider my comments (only a few of which are specific to SWBPD WG concerns, particularly: #j100, #j062, #j020, #j110 below). ]] I say also: [[ I would suggest that if it becomes important as to whether any specific comment has SWBPD WG consensus that the XML Schema WG could ask directly. ]] so unless the chairs wish that we have discussion now of the four highlighted comments, that we mark this matter as closed, until/unless the XML Schema group ask a specific question as to whether my personal comments have WG support. JeremyReceived on Wednesday, 27 July 2005 13:55:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:10 UTC