- From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:48:59 -0700
- To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
It seems to me that the TF proposes to: * work from existing best practice for non-semantic annotation to * propose good ideas that may become best practice for using RDF/OWL to do annotation of multi-media document? Ostensibly the latter is out of scope because there is currently no best practice for how to use OWL/RDF for annotation. There is a lot of best practice for annotation of multi-media in general. Thus, what argument can be given that this is in scope? Are we willing to be flexible and allow the TF to go forward, despite being in a gray area with respect to scoping? I for one, would we willing to vote for the WG, despite the above. Rules are meant to serve us, not hinder us. If there is a lot of energy for this task, and it is going to produce good results, then what are the benefits of limiting this? Mike ============================================ Mike Uschold Mathematics and Computing Technology -- Phantom Works; Tel: 425 865-3605 Fax: 425 865-2965 Building: 3307 Cube: 33D3 ============================================
Received on Monday, 25 July 2005 18:49:11 UTC