- From: Phil Tetlow <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:38:22 -0500
- To: Daniel Oberle <oberle@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, bernard.vatant@mondeca.com, jeff.pan@manchester.ac.uk
Daniel, SE is such a broad discipline that it is always dangerous to over generalise, as I am sure you will appreciate. Nevertheless, I think this all comes down to the 'richness' of the identification schemes needed to formally conceptualise the embodiment of a specification, idea or domain - a core issue for Software Engineers IMHO. Hence the reason for raising composite identification schemes in the SETF. Your further thoughts on this would of course, however, be valued. As for examples, I would rather not 'steal the thunder' of those specifically concentrating on this area if you don't mind. I understand that Tom Croucher (who is specifically working on Composite IFP concepts) may soon be formally applying to join the SWBP and he is far more in tune with this area than I am. As such perhaps we could ask Tom to help us further here? This also looks like a topic that we should pick up on the next SE telecon (Tuesday next week). Regards Phil Tetlow Senior Consultant IBM Business Consulting Services Mobile. (+44) 7740 923328 Daniel Oberle <oberle@aifb.uni- karlsruhe.de> To bernard.vatant@mondeca.com, Phil 27/01/2005 04:38 Tetlow/UK/IBM@IBMGB cc public-swbp-wg@w3.org Subject Re: [SE] Composite Identification Schemes on the Semantic Web Hi Phil and Bernard (CC SETF), I was following this thread, had a look at the referenced papers and also http://dl-web.man.ac.uk/~panz/swse/ Of course, composite identification schemes are a hot topic for the Semantic Web in general. But why is it so important when discussing Semantic Web and in particular software engineering? Can you give me a simple example? I'm probably ignorant on this topic, but I don't see the motivation to discuss it in our task force. In particular I don't find it reading http://dl-web.man.ac.uk/~panz/swse/ Please make me get rid of my ignorance ;-) Best, Daniel
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 10:34:46 UTC