- From: Daniel Oberle <oberle@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:28:49 +0100
- To: michael.f.uschold@boeing.com
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi Mike, your suggested contents are in line with one of the comments I made earlier (pasted below from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jan/0046.html). IMHO this is pretty important so we should clarify it. Best, Daniel > I was left a bit confused. What's unclear IMO is if > > a) we want to use Semantic Web technologies in SE > example: using OWL for reasoning and querying with software > components in an Application Server to improve component-based > SE (like done in [4]) -> the Semantic Web itself is of no interest here > > or > > b) we want to use/incorporate the Semantic Web in SE > example: like you describe it in the text below, we could use the > Web for runtime component sharing, not to mention the exciting > possibilities of Semantic Web Services -> the Semantic Web with > its annotated resources is of interest here > > Apart from the fact that one can do both at a time, I think the > points should be presented separately. The distinction is also unclear > in the text below what gave me a hard time following it.
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 10:26:54 UTC