- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:00:26 +0000
- To: Phil Tetlow <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>
- CC: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, ewallace@cme.nist.gov, Grady Booch <gbooch@us.ibm.com>, Bob Lojek <bob.lojek@uk.ibm.com>
Thanks, that's helpful ... at a personal level I would be uncomfortable with the previously highlighted paragraph being forwarded as part of a WG review; I'm trying to sound out some of my colleagues who are more knowledgeable on UML than me, but it feels like I can leave it at the level of Jeremy disagrees with Phil rather than escalate to HP disagrees with IBM! (I guess I should try and articulate why I disagree with you .. hopefully before the telecon tomorrow) I suspect some of my comments lean in the other direction, I'll try and highlight those ones when I write them up tomorrow. Jeremy Phil Tetlow wrote: > > > > Jeremy, > > Certainly. My recollection of the last telecon was that Guus asked for a > personal review of the ODM document and, as such, I tried hard to phrase my > mail from a first person perspective. The text below, as you quite > correctly identified, is, hence, solely a collection of personal thoughts > and in no way represents IBM's corporate opinion. If a corporate opinion is > required then this will take significantly more time and effort. > Nevertheless I did pass my review by Bob Lojek for comment before I > submitted to the public mailing list . As such I have also copied him on > this mail as well. > > Kind Regards > > Phil Tetlow > Senior Consultant > IBM Business Consulting Services
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 17:00:48 UTC