- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:05:58 +0000
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Note - the time frame is very short given the length of the document. In two weeks Hp's reviewing effort would be less than what we ideally like. Four weeks would be a little better, and eight weeks would allow significantly better review. I am currently assuming that the two weeks is non-negotiable, but ... Jeremy Guus Schreiber wrote: > > ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> The revised submission for the OMG Ontology Definition Metamodel (ODM) >> is now available via >> http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/05-01-01.pdf >> This document specifies: * MOF metamodels for RDFS, OWL, Common Logic, >> Topic Maps, and Entity Relationship modeling; * UML profiles for >> RDFS, OWL, and Topic Maps; and * some mappings between RDFS/OWL and >> other metamodels including UML. >> >> The ODM revised submission will be presented and discussed at the >> upcoming OMG Technical Committee meeting to be held Jan 31 - Feb 4. >> It would be helpful to have any SWBPD member comments on this >> submission by 26 Jan, so that they can be discussed at the meeting. > > > All, > > I would welcome all offers for reviewing part(s) of the ODM submission, > in particular from participants who cannot attend the telecon this week. > The time frame is short, but it well worth the effort. > > Guus > >> >> -Evan >> >> Evan K. Wallace >> Manufacturing Systems Integration Division >> NIST >> >
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:06:22 UTC