- From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:43:35 +0100
- To: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Mark, - I think that "antonym" the rdf:type wn:Word and "antonym" the rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty currently have the same URI (wn:antonym). Am I missing something? Or do you need a separate namespace for the schema and the instance data? - And in wordnet-antonym.rdf: <rdf:Description rdf:about="&wn;natural_object-n-1"> <wn:antonym rdf:resource="&wn;artifact-n-1"/> <wn:antonymOf rdf:resource="&wn;artifact-n-1"/> </rdf:Description> Isn't antonym supposed to be the inverse of antonymOf? Now they are identical. Jacco
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 13:44:27 UTC