W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > December 2005

[WN] technical questions

From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:43:35 +0100
Message-ID: <43A02187.5040905@cwi.nl>
To: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

Mark,
- I think that "antonym" the rdf:type wn:Word and "antonym" the rdf:type 
owl:ObjectProperty currently have the same URI (wn:antonym).  Am I 
missing something? Or do you need a separate namespace for the schema 
and the instance data?

- And in wordnet-antonym.rdf:
<rdf:Description rdf:about="&wn;natural_object-n-1">
  <wn:antonym rdf:resource="&wn;artifact-n-1"/>
  <wn:antonymOf rdf:resource="&wn;artifact-n-1"/>
</rdf:Description>

Isn't antonym supposed to be the inverse of antonymOf?  Now they are 
identical.

Jacco
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 13:44:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:15 UTC