- From: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:43:27 +0100
- To: Peter Mika <pmika@cs.vu.nl>
- CC: "'Jeremy Carroll'" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, "'Aldo Gangemi'" <aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it>, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, schreiber@cs.vu.nl, mark@cs.vu.nl, Benjamin.Nguyen@inria.fr
Peter Mika wrote: >Hi All, > >Regarding the second issue: I think it's less of a problem. Once you agree >on the actual representation of WordNet, you can make it available either as >a single file or a set of files, e.g. one for each resource, containing only >the triples where that resource appears. > > I agree, but you still need to define exactly what triples are returned for each type of URI. So, what subgraph does resolving http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf/entity actually return? And what about http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf/antonym? >The WordNet server can then either serve these static files or run a RESTful >Web Service in the background that queries the ontology dynamically. > > In theory, yes, but in practice I doubt that Princeton is going to develop such a service. >In any case as Jeremy says what you want are slash URIs. > > I agree. Jacco
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 13:52:52 UTC