- From: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:09:37 +0100
- To: Jacco van Ossenbruggen <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>
- CC: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jacco,
You're right, thanks for spotting this. Will get these bug out in the
next version. A collegue of mine (Willem Verhage) also found a bug.
Some words contain slashes and end up in the fragment of the URI,
which of course it should not. I will replace slashes with an
underscore in the next version.
Mark.
Jacco van Ossenbruggen wrote:
>
> Mark,
> - I think that "antonym" the rdf:type wn:Word and "antonym" the rdf:type
> owl:ObjectProperty currently have the same URI (wn:antonym). Am I
> missing something? Or do you need a separate namespace for the schema
> and the instance data?
>
> - And in wordnet-antonym.rdf:
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="&wn;natural_object-n-1">
> <wn:antonym rdf:resource="&wn;artifact-n-1"/>
> <wn:antonymOf rdf:resource="&wn;artifact-n-1"/>
> </rdf:Description>
>
> Isn't antonym supposed to be the inverse of antonymOf? Now they are
> identical.
>
> Jacco
>
--
Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
markREMOVE@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark
Received on Friday, 16 December 2005 15:41:10 UTC