- From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 08:03:02 -0700
- To: "Thomas Baker" <thomas.baker@izb.fraunhofer.de>, "SW Best Practices" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Regarding section 2 below, here is some material that may be useful as
input:
Relationships between Metamodels, Ontologies, Thesauri, Taxonomies and
Controlled Vocabularies. A set of definitions is provided by Woody
Pidcock. Click or scroll to comments for a response with additional
material highlighting the similarities and differences by Mike Uschold.
http://www.metamodel.com/article.php?story=20030115211223271 or
http://www.metamodel.com/article.php?story=20030115211223271&mode=print
Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Baker [mailto:thomas.baker@izb.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 7:33 AM
To: SW Best Practices
Subject: [ALL,VM] Proposed VM note outline
Dear all,
I am proposing an outline for the Vocabulary Management note
(see below). As I first step, I am posting this outline to the
list asking each member of the group to answer six questions
about the planned scope and objectives (see my next posting).
This shorter version will be helpful as a basis for discussion
on the conference call today.
Tom
----
SWBPD "Vocabulary Management"
Draft, 2004-09-02
NAME
Vocabulary Management - Scoping Draft - Proposed outline
MEMBERS
Tom Baker (Fraunhofer Society)
Libby Miller (University of Bristol)
Natasha Noy (Stanford University)
Dan Brickley (W3C)
Alistair Miles (CCL)
Alan Rector (University of Manchester)
James Hendler (University of Maryland)
Aldo Gangemi (CNR)
Bernard Vatant (Mondeca)
Ralph Swick (W3C)
Proposed outline
Section 1. Terminology
I assume that we would need to agree -- at least for
the purposes of the VM note -- on the meaning of some
basic terms. Section 1, then, would define a list of a
dozen or so basic terms such as "term" and "vocabulary".
Section 2. Vocabularies in the Semantic Web
I assume we need to characterize what it is we are
talking about in terms of standard buzzwords that
people will have heard, such as Metadata Element Sets,
Controlled Vocabularies, Taxonomies, and Ontologies.
I also assume we should not neglect to articulate
some really basic assumptions about the Semantic Web,
such as data merging and repurposing.
Section 3. Principles of Good Practice
I assume we will be able to agree on some really basic
principles, such as "Identify Terms with URIs (or
URIrefs)" or "Articulate any policies or assumptions
underlying the assignment of URIs". Beyond that, we
should see how far we can go. Personally, I believe
that if we could articulate half a dozen or so simple
principles and elaborate on each principle in two or
three paragraphs, with pointers to actual practice,
these principles could form the core contribution of
the VM note.
Section 4. Evolving issues
On many issues we will not be able to agree, whether
because the issues are controversial (e.g., the idea of
"ownership" of a namespace which surfaced on this list
in response to an earlier draft) or because they are
the object of ongoing discussion and experimentation.
We should try to distill these issues down to a
"manageable" number -- a dozen or so -- and discuss
each issue in one or two paragraphs which describe
the issue and characterize the main viewpoints, areas
of development, or controversies, with pointers to
the literature. In my opinion, a "manageable" number
is important not just to aid the reader, but also to
allow us to divide ownership of the issues among Task
Force members.
--
Dr. Thomas Baker Thomas.Baker@izb.fraunhofer.de
Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027
53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352
Personal email: thbaker79@alumni.amherst.edu
Received on Thursday, 2 September 2004 15:03:37 UTC