- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:58:18 +0100
- To: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0107.html IRC log: http://www.w3.org/2004/06/24-swbp-irc Chair: Ralph Scribe: Jeremy Summary: Decision: RESOLVED WRLD TF is on hold New Actions: ACTION: ralph sort out Aldo's mail issues ACTION: aldo create introductorydoc for WNET TF ACTION: ralph CVS access for Brian, Aldo, Natasha, Tom ACTION: Ralph copy http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/att-0010/Semantic_Web_Best_Practices-_WordNet_Task_Force.html in WG directory ACTION: tom quck read of ClassesAsValues for dc:subject issue ACTION: brian review ClassesAsValues for publication ACTION: jeremy review n-ary relations ACTION: David review list of values ACTION: Ralph copy drafts into WG web space ACTION: tom send ssh2 public key to ralph More Detailed Minutes: 1. ADMINISTRIVIA (10 mins) Roll call: MikeUschold, Brian_McBride, Jeremy, DavidWood, Alan, Fabien, Natasha, TomAdams, Benjamin, Jos, Jhendler, TomBaker, Ralph, Aldo Regrets: Guus, DanBri, Evan, Libby, Alistair, Gary, Deb, Nick, David Norheim Next Meeting: July 8th 14:00Z Regrets for 8th July from Alan, Natasha, Jim and Benjamin Minutes of the June 10 telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0099.html accepted 2 ACTION ITEM REVIEW continued actions: ================== ACTION: Aldo prepare summary of Wordnet proposal doc, and send to Christian after review by WG. http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-16-05 ACTION: Guus to revise WD/Note process proposal for Jun24 meeting http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-25-35 ACTION: Guus invite at least 1 wordnet domain expert to a July1st http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-03-03 ACTION: ralph to create a dir for the wordnet tf's ongoing work and give access to brian, ... http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-08-16 Completed actions: ACTION: Ralph add 'Vocabulary Management' to WG home page list of Task Forces under discussion to start http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-40-19 done http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/#Tasks ACTION: Ralph get 17 June VOCAB telecon reservation http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-47-44 (done, in the past) ACTION: libby, natasha, danbri, al, alan, jim, tom, send thoughts/comments re scoping of Vocab management TF work http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-49-07 ACTION: tom send revised notion of prev posting proposing a scope for vocab management TF http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-49-33 done http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0061.html ACTION: jim to message to list proposing the WORLD TF goes on hold http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T14-56-30 done http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0082.html ACTION: guus arrange for telecon for july 1st 1400 UTC 60mins on step1 'as is' conversion of Wordnet to RDF/OWL (brian, jjc,guus, danbri, ?aldo, ...) http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-05-35 done? telecon is in the schedule: http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20040701 and http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/#Current ACTION: jjc try to attent an XML Schema WG telecon http://www.w3.org/2004/06/10-swbp-irc#T15-13-00 New actions arising: ACTION: ralph sort out Aldo's mail issues ACTION: aldo create introductorydoc for WNET TF ACTION: ralph CVS access for Brian, Aldo, Natasha, Tom 3. WG publication process Brian is happy, no other discussion. 4. Task Force Reports TF HTML template http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/0004.html TF coordinators: status for moving to this format? 4.1 WNET Short discussion, curtailed in favour of more extended discussioon on the 30th. Aldo suggested adding OWL to Brian's RDFS. Jeremy hoped that we would publish a WD around the first phase before moving to the second phase. Brian noted he had outstanding issues to discuss, but they were left until the next meeting. ACTION: Ralph copy http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/att-0010/Semantic_Web_Best_Practices-_WordNet_Task_Force.html in WG directory 4.2 XML Schema datatypes XML Schema WG will be discussing Thursday or Friday 25th under "inter-working group cooperation". 4.3 ADTF - Applications and Demos Benjamin wants to be added to the list of participants. Fabien suggested editing the Wiki page himself: http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebBestPracticesTaskForceOnApplicationsAndDemos 4.4 WRLD - World View Proposal: put TF on hold jim: proposed, jeremy: second RESOLVED WRLD TF is on hold 4.5 OEP discussion centred around allocating reviewers for drafts for publication, and known outstanding issues. [OEP] Classes as values Outstanding issue: use dc:subject or not? Natasha has circulated two drafts, one which uses dc:subject and one which doesn't. ACTION: tom quck read of ClassesAsValues for dc:subject issue ACTION: brian review ClassesAsValues for publication The version discussed at the telecon was: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/att-0031/ClassesAsValues-v6.html this is superceded by http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/ClassesAsValues-20040623/ [OEP] n-ary relations ACTION: jeremy review n-ary relations The version discussed at the telecon was: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jun/att-0030/n-aryRelations-v2.html this is superceded by: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/n-aryRelations-20040623/ [OEP] Lists of Values Brian - I found this helpful. ACTION: David review list of values The version discussed at the telecon was: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jun/att-0121/lists_of_values-4.zip this is superceded by: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Lists-of-values-20040625/ ACTION: Ralph copy drafts into WG web space 4.6 PORT - Porting thesauri No discussion 4.7 VM - Vocabulary Management Small amount of discussion. Tom would like guidance on the dependency section of TF description. ACTION: tom send ssh2 public key to ralph 5. Any Other Business none officially, but unofficially ralph clarified three features of a first WD 1) not necessarily perfect 2) purpose is to let public know where we are 3) lets W3C director know what we are doing Adjourned with time to spare.
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 12:58:44 UTC