- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:14:36 -0400
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
* Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org> [2004-07-21 21:25-0400] > 6. TF UPDATES (5-15 min each) > > 6.1 OEP (Deb) > > 6.2 PORT (DanBri) > > FW: [PORT/THES] Concrete actions > From: Miles, AJ (Alistair) <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk> > Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:26:13 +0100 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jul/0068.html I agree with David [1] (welcome, David!) that Alistair's plan of 9 July looks good. I've seen no objections, and would like to confirm our support of the plan during this call. Although as I write the telecon looms, the action plan has been before the group for over a week now, so I don't believe it would be premature to ask the WG to agree to it. I propose a couple of explicit amendments which I guess would be covered anyway, but I'd like to get them recorded. Basically I am happy adopting the SKOS proposals as our strawman starting point, but would like to make sure the comments/papers from Mindlab and Amsterdam (sorry for the vague references; couldn't find URLs, digging...) get addressed. I am also happy using public-esw-thes@w3.org as the main list for working out the details for the thesaurus vocab, so long as this WGs list gets regular updates and we subscribe all interested WG members (ie. TF members) to that list. I'd be happy to handle practicalities of that. We should be able to decide the mailing list question separately to the question of adopting Alistair's workplan. If anyone objects to doing the bulk of the PORT/THES vocab design on public-esw-thes (a list populated with thesaurus experts collaborating around SKOS), now would be a good time to note your preference. So when we get to the PORT/THES portion of the agenda, I would like to ask that we adopt http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jul/0068.html as our plan for progressing this taskforce, or record and act upon any objections raised during the telecon. If we do this, it should be possible to get moving towards Working Draft publication through the summer. How does that sound, folks? Dan [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Jul/0079.html
Received on Thursday, 22 July 2004 07:15:05 UTC