RE: An inconsistency in OWL XML Presentation Syntax?

On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 19:16, Uschold, Michael F wrote:
> It seems to me that minimally, there should be a summary of known
> errors/bugs/problems with OWL that is pointed to in a clear obvious
> (i.e. hard to miss) manner in the official OWL document pages. This
> current problem would go on that list.
>
> If there is no mechanism for this to occur, it seems like an oversight.

We maintain errata for the Recommendations...
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/errata

but we don't promise to maintain WG Notes. Again, from the status
section:

> "The authors welcome comments on this document, but does not guarantee a
> reply or any further action. [...] no commitment is made by the W3C, or
> any of its members, regarding future updates."
>   -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-owl-xmlsyntax-20030611/

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 06:56:19 UTC