RE: An inconsistency in OWL XML Presentation Syntax?

One reasonable process is:
* there is an official person/email that one should send notifications
of errata to -and-
* there is a convenient and relatively obvious way for people to
discover who/where to send errata information to.

Some of this may already be in place. SWBPD is not the errata contact
focal, and Peter apparently did not know for sure where to send the
information.  

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 11:56 PM
To: Uschold, Michael F
Cc: Peter F. Patel-Schneider; Motik@fzi.de; public-swbp-wg@w3.org;
public-webont-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: An inconsistency in OWL XML Presentation Syntax?

On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 19:16, Uschold, Michael F wrote:
> It seems to me that minimally, there should be a summary of known
> errors/bugs/problems with OWL that is pointed to in a clear obvious
> (i.e. hard to miss) manner in the official OWL document pages. This
> current problem would go on that list.
>
> If there is no mechanism for this to occur, it seems like an
oversight.

We maintain errata for the Recommendations...
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/errata

but we don't promise to maintain WG Notes. Again, from the status
section:

> "The authors welcome comments on this document, but does not guarantee
a
> reply or any further action. [...] no commitment is made by the W3C,
or
> any of its members, regarding future updates."
>   -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-owl-xmlsyntax-20030611/

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 16:32:32 UTC