- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:30:25 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Cc: Jim Farrugia <james.farrugia@maine.edu>, public-sw-meaning@w3.org
> > * List the issues
>
> This is a sticking point. I think the list is not short, and not clean
> or easy to state. And even if short, then *very* not easy to sort out.
So I listed the issues I saw; no one has yet said how well they match
the issues they see; there has been one complaint that listing issues
is a bad idea.
> > * State, or have Tim state, "Tim's solution", succinctly.
It's a nice idea, but I'm afraid we'll have to draw it out in
discussion. Tim's stated it a few times, but never completely enough
for everyone. Personally, I'm happy with his presenting and arguing
for bits as they are relevant to discussing particular issues.
> I would like to get clear on the "use of a URI in RDF implies
> commitment to the ontology". I think that's a fine topic for the first
> telecon and given the electrons spilt already a meaty enough task. (I
> even tried framing an issue on it! :))
>
> I would also be happy discussing Peter's document.
>
> I would like a chair, and have proposed Sandro as chair for the first
> telecon.
That works for me.
Anyone have any other agenda items to propose?
-- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 08:30:14 UTC