- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 04:37:27 -0400
- To: Jim Farrugia <james.farrugia@maine.edu>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 01:17 PM, Jim Farrugia wrote: > I wonder if we could do the following before the Friday telecon, I'm skeptical. > using a > relatively small number of words, say, 500 or fewer? > > * Agree, if possible, on Peter's two points below. > > * List the issues This is a sticking point. I think the list is not short, and not clean or easy to state. And even if short, then *very* not easy to sort out. > * State, or have Tim state, "Tim's solution", succinctly. I would like to get clear on the "use of a URI in RDF implies commitment to the ontology". I think that's a fine topic for the first telecon and given the electrons spilt already a meaty enough task. (I even tried framing an issue on it! :)) I would also be happy discussing Peter's document. I would like a chair, and have proposed Sandro as chair for the first telecon. [snip] Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 04:37:29 UTC