- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 21:13:36 +1000
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Chris, On 08/07/14 02:07, Chris Lilley wrote: > I updated the draft charter, mainly to update the list of > deliverables. DOMMatrix is added, Compositing & Blending is CR. Do we > have other Editors Drafts lurking about which are not yet published > and we want to add it? A few comments: * There are a couple of instances of "SVG2" that should be "SVG 2". * We should mention the SVG Streaming proposal that Cyril was working on. I need to fix https://svgwg.org/specs/streaming/ to make it actually show the draft; the underlying files are still at https://svgwg.org/hg/svg2/file/tip/specs/streaming/. We may still need to have a discussion about the future of that document, but for now I think it would be good to mention in the charter. * DOMMatrix appears twice in section 2.1. * We should list the Web Application Security WG (in the liasons section?) with whom we recently discussed CSP 1.1. Sorry for not taking a look sooner. > If specs are in the "Rec in two years" group and we think that is > unlikely, they can be moved into the "CR" or "WD if time" groups. I'm hesitant to guess. I think Transitions, Animations and Transforms have a good chance of being at Rec by then. The others less so, but still possible. > Rich, if you could check that the accessibility > deliverables are now correct (they were wrong before). We now have > > - SVG2 User Agent Implementation Guide (new) > (joint with WAI PF) > > - An update of (or replacement for) Accessibility Features of > SVG, aimed at content creators > > The wording of the second item gives us the flexibility to rename it > or split it as desired. That sounds good to me. > I also updated the language about call for consensus; its a copy of > what was recently approved for the CSS WG charter. I like this decision policy new wording. Thanks, Cameron
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 11:13:55 UTC