Re: agenda, 13 June 2013 SVG WG telcon

On Jun 13, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com> wrote:

> I'm not making any changes to the CSS part, only to the part that describes how things should happen in SVG.
> 
> Since my changes are editorial anyway (= should have no effect on implementors), maybe we should just go ahead and do another WD with the current text.

Fine with me! I do not think that the changes are that necessary that they need to go in this WD anyway.

Greetings,
Dirk

> 
> Rik
> ________________________________________
> From: Cameron McCormack [cam@mcc.id.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:51 PM
> To: Rik Cabanier
> Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: agenda, 13 June 2013 SVG WG telcon
> 
> Rik Cabanier wrote:
>> Since we're going to use stacking contexts for SVG, should I update
>> the spec before we decide to go to WD, or should I put in a note and
>> we can still vote?
> 
> In the SVG 2 spec, or Compositing?  I don't know that I would go to
> special effort to get this in for the SVG 2 publication; there will
> always be another one in a few months.  But if you feel we should get it
> in to a WD in there soon, then I'm happy for the publication to happen a
> week later, to give you a chance to put that text in and for us to
> review it.
> 
> For Compositing, given that you already have the CSS WG's approval on
> publishing, it might invalidate their decision to be adding to the
> document at this point.
>

Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 16:53:43 UTC