RE: agenda, 13 June 2013 SVG WG telcon

I'm not making any changes to the CSS part, only to the part that describes how things should happen in SVG.

Since my changes are editorial anyway (= should have no effect on implementors), maybe we should just go ahead and do another WD with the current text.

Rik
________________________________________
From: Cameron McCormack [cam@mcc.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:51 PM
To: Rik Cabanier
Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: agenda, 13 June 2013 SVG WG telcon

Rik Cabanier wrote:
> Since we're going to use stacking contexts for SVG, should I update
> the spec before we decide to go to WD, or should I put in a note and
> we can still vote?

In the SVG 2 spec, or Compositing?  I don't know that I would go to
special effort to get this in for the SVG 2 publication; there will
always be another one in a few months.  But if you feel we should get it
in to a WD in there soon, then I'm happy for the publication to happen a
week later, to give you a chance to put that text in and for us to
review it.

For Compositing, given that you already have the CSS WG's approval on
publishing, it might invalidate their decision to be adding to the
document at this point.

Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 16:47:09 UTC