Re: Canonical order for property definitions in SVG2

• From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
• Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:15:02 +1100
• To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
• CC: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4F1B8D46.4050808@mcc.id.au>

Chris Lilley:
> The new style of CSS WG specs includes some changes compared to older
> specs for property definitions:
>
> - adds an 'animatable' field (we had that already for 12 years) -
> adds a 'Canonical order' field (we don't have that)
>
> see http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/format-update and
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-module/#the-display-model (for an
> example).
>
> In general we should ensure that SVG-defined properties have all the
> fields that CSSWG has (such as computed value, which was in their old
> template as well but not in SVG 1.1).

Yes, good idea, and let's use the same formatting too.  (The SVG 1.1 
spec formatting matched the old CSS 2.0 formatting.)  I gave myself 
ACTION-3231 to remember to do this.

Received on Sunday, 22 January 2012 04:15:41 UTC