- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:20:27 -0500
- To: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>
- CC: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>, "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, Sandy Roberts <sandro@microsoft.com>
Hi, Tav- That sounds reasonable. Going forward, we might also mark tests with conformance classes for different types of UA... there are many areas where authoring tools should not be expected to necessarily implement, and some that would apply only to authoring tools. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG, WebApps, and Web Events WGs Patrick Dengler wrote (on 1/26/11 1:47 PM): > I'm on board with this :) > > -----Original Message----- From: public-svg-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-svg-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tavmjong Bah Sent: > Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:30 AM To: public-svg-wg@w3.org Subject: > Adding a NA catagory to the test matrix. > > > Hi, > > I would really like to be able to change Inkscape's FAILs to NAs in > the implementation test matrix for tests that don't apply to Inkscape > (tests that require interactivity) as suggested by Chris. I could > make the changes but don't know how implementation_matrix.html is > generated. > > Tav > > > > > > --
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 20:20:29 UTC