- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:05:14 +1200
- To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Erik Dahlstrom: > here are my thoughts on possibly unapproving some tests that > currently have fewer than two passing implementations[1]. > > - filters-light-03-f > Prefer it if it stays, depends on mozilla patch status - ACTION-3027 [2]. This won’t be able to land immediately. Some more (Gecko) tests need to be written before it can be checked in. I agree we can leave the test in and note that unofficial Firefox builds pass it. > - fonts-desc-04-t, fonts-desc-05-t > Unapproving these is ok with me, it's somewhere between testing > svgfonts and CSS fontmatching/fallbacks. Agree. > - painting-render-02-b > Has two passes counting ASV, so incorrectly flagged in the table. Agree. > - text-dom-04-f > Tried my best to convert the used SVGFont to WOFF but sadly failed > to get the desired results, see ACTION-2957 [3] for details. I'm > fine with unapproving the test until that can be worked out. Thanks for trying, agree. > - text-dom-05-f > I'm ok with unapproving this for now so that we can revisit the > text DOM methods in SVG2. It’s a larger change than I thought in Gecko, so I can’t get this done. Agree that it’s OK to drop. > - text-intro-02-b, text-intro-09-b > These are passed in Opera 11 and Chromium 13 (and also I think in > the webkit nightly that was used in the table). The reference image > was incorrect on the third line, but that's now been fixed. Just > needs retesting and an update to the results xml-files. Great! -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 22:05:49 UTC