- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 17:17:13 +0200
- To: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi, here are my thoughts on possibly unapproving some tests that currently have fewer than two passing implementations[1]. - filters-light-03-f Prefer it if it stays, depends on mozilla patch status - ACTION-3027 [2]. - fonts-desc-04-t, fonts-desc-05-t Unapproving these is ok with me, it's somewhere between testing svgfonts and CSS fontmatching/fallbacks. - painting-render-02-b Has two passes counting ASV, so incorrectly flagged in the table. - text-dom-04-f Tried my best to convert the used SVGFont to WOFF but sadly failed to get the desired results, see ACTION-2957 [3] for details. I'm fine with unapproving the test until that can be worked out. - text-dom-05-f I'm ok with unapproving this for now so that we can revisit the text DOM methods in SVG2. - text-intro-02-b, text-intro-09-b These are passed in Opera 11 and Chromium 13 (and also I think in the webkit nightly that was used in the table). The reference image was incorrect on the third line, but that's now been fixed. Just needs retesting and an update to the results xml-files. [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/status/implementation_matrix.html [2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/3027 [3] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2957 -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 15:17:43 UTC